Oral Presentation Neuropathophysiology - an ISH satellite 2012

Effect of combining flavonol and remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial post-ischaemia reperfusion salvage (#41)

Colleen Thomas 1 2 , U Varma 1 3 , D C Ng 4 , L M Delbridge 3 , C n May 1
  1. Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Parkville, Victoria (VIC), Australia
  2. Department of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria (VIC), Australia
  3. Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria (VIC), Australia
  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria (VIC), Australia

BACKGROUND: The heart can be protected against prolonged ischemia by applying brief episodes of intermittent ischaemia to an organ or tissue remote from the heart (termed remote ischaemic conditioning, remote-IPC). This has the advantage of being able to be non-invasively applied using a blood pressure cuff, and proof-of-concept clinical studies have recently provided encouraging results using remote-IPC. The mediators of remote-IPC are uncertain, but both neural and humoral pathways have been implicated in animal studies. The present study examined the molecular mechanisms of myocardial protection afforded by remote-ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in the hind-limb of sheep, and whether the combination of a novel cardioprotectant flavonol NP202 with RIPC produced additional cardioprotection above that afforded by individual treatments alone. 

METHODS: Anaesthetized sheep were randomly allocated to 4 groups: sham conditioning ± NP202 or RIPC ± NP202 (each n=4). RIPC consisted of 3x5 min occlusions of the iliac artery. Subsequently, animals underwent coronary artery occlusion for 1 h then, 5 min before reperfusion animals, were treated with vehicle or NP202 (6.6 mg/kg, IV). At the end of 3 h reperfusion infarct size was measured, and non-infarcted area-at-risk (AAR) myocardium (the area that can be rescued by treatment) was collected to assess activation of protein kinases.

RESULTS: Separately, RIPC and NP202 significantly reduced infarct size compared to control (by 45±10% and 51±16 %, respectively, P<0.05). No synergistic effect of combined RIPC and NP202 treatment on infarct size reduction was observed (infarct size was reduced by a comparable 42±10%). Myocardial I/R also induced pro-survival (ERK1/2, AKT) and pro-injury (p38, JNK) kinase phosphorylation, however no significant modulatory effect of RIPC and NP202 on kinase phosphorylation could be demonstrated. 

CONCLUSIONS: RIPC and NP202 are effective individual treatment strategies to reduce myocardial I/R injury.  However, combining both therapies did not offer greater cardioprotection than either treatment alone.

DISCLOSURES:  CN May is a shareholder in NeuProtect, a company which holds a patent for use of flavonols as a treatment for myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury.